licence: SchOS is GPL-2.0-or-later, no longer Apache-2.0
Nexoniarz is the sole author and SchOS was never published under Apache-2.0, so this is a straight relicence. LICENSE is the FSF GPLv2 text, every first-party SPDX header moves to GPL-2.0-or-later, and NOTICE, README.md, docs/licensing.md and the site say so. projects/schfs-linux follows the rest of the tree. The GPL gives copyleft: a fork has to ship its source. It also lifts the old "Linux drivers, never" rule, since GPL-2.0-only code combines with GPL-2.0-or-later. "Or later" leaves room for GPLv3, but one binary still has to pick one version, so docs/licensing.md now keeps Apache-2.0 and GPLv3 code out of the kernel to keep Linux code possible there. BSD 4-clause code goes from "avoid" to "no", because the advertising clause is GPL-incompatible. LDLS still ships no .ko. That boundary is now project policy rather than a legal requirement, and ldls.md, devices.md and licensing.md section 6 say so. refmod declares license=GPL, and ldls-check passes (27 checks). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b26575b4a
commit
26bca020b6
135 changed files with 959 additions and 689 deletions
5
.gitignore
vendored
5
.gitignore
vendored
|
|
@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ docs/Website/releases/
|
|||
# Kernel modules, ever. docs/plan/ldls.md rule 1: LDLS ships the layer and
|
||||
# never the thing it loads, and that applies to this tree as well as to an
|
||||
# image. The loader's test input is built from ldls/test/refmod.c, which is
|
||||
# ours; a .ko here would be someone else's GPL code in an Apache-2.0 repo.
|
||||
# ours; a .ko here would be someone else's code, with its own provenance, in
|
||||
# a tree that is otherwise all first-party or attributed in NOTICE.
|
||||
*.ko
|
||||
*.ko.xz
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ core.*
|
|||
#
|
||||
# help/ is where a third-party kernel gets cloned when it is worth reading --
|
||||
# Zircon, at the time of writing. It is BSD-licensed and this project is
|
||||
# Apache-2.0, so the licences are compatible and that is *not* the reason it is
|
||||
# GPL-2.0-or-later, so the licences are compatible and that is *not* the reason it is
|
||||
# ignored: it is ignored because a copy of another project's source inside this
|
||||
# one is a copy that will rot, that nobody will update, and that makes the
|
||||
# provenance of every file around it a question. Clone it, read it, learn the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue