licence: SchOS is GPL-2.0-or-later, no longer Apache-2.0
Nexoniarz is the sole author and SchOS was never published under Apache-2.0, so this is a straight relicence. LICENSE is the FSF GPLv2 text, every first-party SPDX header moves to GPL-2.0-or-later, and NOTICE, README.md, docs/licensing.md and the site say so. projects/schfs-linux follows the rest of the tree. The GPL gives copyleft: a fork has to ship its source. It also lifts the old "Linux drivers, never" rule, since GPL-2.0-only code combines with GPL-2.0-or-later. "Or later" leaves room for GPLv3, but one binary still has to pick one version, so docs/licensing.md now keeps Apache-2.0 and GPLv3 code out of the kernel to keep Linux code possible there. BSD 4-clause code goes from "avoid" to "no", because the advertising clause is GPL-incompatible. LDLS still ships no .ko. That boundary is now project policy rather than a legal requirement, and ldls.md, devices.md and licensing.md section 6 say so. refmod declares license=GPL, and ldls-check passes (27 checks). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b26575b4a
commit
26bca020b6
135 changed files with 959 additions and 689 deletions
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
||||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Check the LDLS loader against an object we compiled ourselves.
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ def main():
|
|||
# straight out of .modinfo. That is the first question anyone should be
|
||||
# able to ask about an object before loading it.
|
||||
need("module refmod" in out, "the module names itself from .modinfo")
|
||||
need("license Apache-2.0" in out,
|
||||
need("license GPL" in out,
|
||||
"the declared licence is read without loading anything")
|
||||
|
||||
# Every kind of section the loader has to place.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue