docs: four directories, and a rule for when a thing leaves the roadmap
docs/ was ten files where a plan, a description, a guide and a bug report all
sat next to each other. It is now architecture/ (what SchOS is), plan/ (what it
will be), guides/ (how to work on it) and history/ (why it is like this), with
an index that states the one rule holding it together: when something is
finished it moves from plan/ to architecture/ and is rewritten as a description
of the thing rather than a record of building it.
A ticked checkbox says the work happened. It does not say what the work
*produced*, and six months later the checkbox is all that is left. The network
stack proved the point: finished, verified end to end, and for a month the only
description of it anywhere was a checkbox four levels of indentation deep.
So roadmap.md went from 534 lines to 181 -- nothing deleted, the done work
graduated. Seven subsystems that were finished and undescribed now have
descriptions: boot, kernel, syscalls, filesystem, networking, graphics, usb,
init. Every one ends with "What it does not do", which is the section that pays;
a document listing only strengths is marketing, and the reader who needs it most
is the one about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.
schfs.md still opened with "phases 1 through 3 1/2 are done, phase 4 is next"
long after all five had landed. It is a description now, with the phase record
and the hard-won bugs moved to history/.
Three corrections found on the way, all load-bearing:
* projects/schcom/README.md claimed SCM_RIGHTS was done. There is no
sendmsg/recvmsg in the kernel at all, and an entire GUI plan rested on it.
* The root README said "No TCP/IP" months after the stack landed.
* history/kernel.md sec.7 was marked "in progress" on a problem that process
groups solved.
Also adds plan/1.0.md, which draws a finish line so the open list stops being
infinite, and marks schwm/ and schde/ superseded: in Wayland the compositor is
the window manager, so that split dissolves rather than being abandoned.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
This commit is contained in:
parent
817d666068
commit
57aff40228
59 changed files with 3981 additions and 1124 deletions
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ appear against a real peer.
|
|||
The NetBSD clause belongs to **WIDE**, not Berkeley, so the 1999 rescission does
|
||||
not reach it. Checked FreeBSD's file directly from `raw.githubusercontent.com`;
|
||||
zero matches for "All advertising materials". Checked lwIP's `COPYING`; likewise
|
||||
zero. This **reverses** the older assumption in `docs/roadmap.md` that NetBSD
|
||||
zero. This **reverses** the older assumption in `docs/plan/roadmap.md` that NetBSD
|
||||
was the intended starting point.
|
||||
|
||||
## The porting evidence, which matters more
|
||||
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ FreeBSD's `sys/netinet` is not a library. `tcp_input.c` alone is 122 KB and
|
|||
reaches into mbufs, `epoch(9)`, netisr, VNET, `uma(9)`, sockbufs, inpcb hash
|
||||
tables and FreeBSD's locking. Taking it means porting FreeBSD's kernel
|
||||
infrastructure first and finding the TCP underneath — the same conclusion
|
||||
`docs/roadmap.md` §1 already reached about `sys/dev/usb`.
|
||||
`docs/plan/roadmap.md` §1 already reached about `sys/dev/usb`.
|
||||
|
||||
**lwIP was written for the situation Schunix is actually in:** a small OS with a
|
||||
raw Ethernet driver and no infrastructure. Port layer is a handful of files, no
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue