docs: a footer note on building with AI
The point is not a disclaimer, it is the argument: the tool is not the measure of a project. Code nobody understands is bad code whoever typed it, and code whose every decision can be explained is good code by the same standard. Placed next to a link to history/ on purpose. That directory is where the claim can be checked -- the bugs are written up in full, including the wrong hypotheses and the measurements that killed them. An explanation you can follow is the evidence; a byline is not. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef94fac4ac
commit
b6450d866d
4 changed files with 48 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -41,6 +41,19 @@ python3 -m http.server 8000
|
|||
Adding a document means adding one line to the `DOCS` array in `docs.js`. The
|
||||
reader will only load a path that appears there.
|
||||
|
||||
## The two footer notes
|
||||
|
||||
Both pages carry two statements below the licence line, and both are meant to
|
||||
be read rather than skimmed past.
|
||||
|
||||
The first is the flag, below. The second is about AI, and it says the thing
|
||||
worth saying: the tool is not the measure. A project is good when the people
|
||||
building it understand what was built. That claim is deliberately made next to
|
||||
a link to `history/`, because that directory is where it can be checked — the
|
||||
bugs are written up in full, including the wrong turns and the measurements
|
||||
that disproved them. An explanation you can follow is the evidence; the byline
|
||||
is not.
|
||||
|
||||
## The flag
|
||||
|
||||
`Assets/pride.svg` is in the top bar and in the footer, on both pages, and it
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue