Commit graph SchOS/.claude/memory/schos-uefi-loader.md
Author SHA1 Message Date
Nexoniarz
7b2d4037a4 Rebuild when RAMROOT is toggled, and add an opt-in KVM target
`make ramroot` wiped the objects on the way in, and nothing wiped on the
way out. So a plain `make` afterwards kept every RAMDISK_ROOT object and
linked the 24 MB ramdisk back into a kernel that no longer used it: 25 MB
where a clean build is 836 KB. It still booted -- from the ramdisk -- and
the only outward symptom was stage2 having thirty times as much to load
through PIO, one sector at a time. That is the "booting got slower"
report this came from.

A stamp file records which setting the objects were built with, and the
tree is dropped when it changes in either direction.

qemu-kvm is opt-in and the default stays TCG, because the suite's timings
were established there. Measured with the guest timing itself,
`ls /bin | wc -l` goes 2.9s -> 1.1s. Boot does not improve and gets
slightly worse: every PIO port access in stage2 is a VM exit under KVM.

Retracts a claim from earlier today. The "2.2x speedup" attributed to the
region-based allocator was a measurement artifact -- the probe sent a
command, slept a fixed 50s on the host, then read /proc/uptime, so it
timed the sleep rather than the command, through a guest clock that drifts
under load. Bracketing the command inside one guest command line shows no
measurable difference. The e820 change is still correct; it is simply not
a performance change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 22:46:00 +02:00
Nexoniarz
b428a50145 memory: UEFI reaches userspace, and the ISO grows a hierarchy
Records the four bugs between "boots to cpu0: starting" and "boots to an
interactive shell", the new ioremap rule for device registers, and what
the disc now contains -- including that it is still not a live CD, and
what that would take.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 22:04:12 +02:00
Nexoniarz
c55e65de5e memory: the e820 work, and why the extended suite flaps
Records the measured effect of the region-based allocator (2.2x on a cold
ls, 6 s off the boot), the two pre-existing UEFI blockers found while
verifying it, and the three confounds that each produced a confident
wrong answer about guest speed in one session.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 21:05:34 +02:00
Nexoniarz
d41a0b1618 memory: the UEFI loader 2026-08-09 17:13:44 +02:00