L4 was listed as "free -- H2 built all of this" and never actually tested,
which is a claim rather than a result. Tested now, and it holds:
ldlsd running ping 2/2; holds index 7 and DMA slots 3 and 4
killed interface DOWN, device released, bus mastering
cleared, DMA reclaimed -- back to vgpud's 3 blocks
ping fails honestly: sendto: -5
a second ldlsd ping 3/3, and the arena hands back the same addresses
pciuser_release_all() and netuser_release_all() sit beside each other in
exit() for the same reason, and that they apply unchanged to a foreign driver
is the whole point of having built them against our own.
With that, every milestone on ldls.md is done, so it leaves docs/plan/ for
docs/architecture/ -- the rule docs/plan/README.md states and the one that
keeps the two directories meaning different things. The new document describes
what is, not what was planned: the five rules, the four pieces, what it costs
(polling, no stack protector, locks that are no-ops), that it can be killed,
and a "what it does not do" that leads with one driver, one kernel version,
tried once.
Sixteen source files pointed at docs/plan/ldls.md and would have been dangling
the moment it moved. All repointed, and the milestone references -- which the
architecture doc deliberately does not have -- rewritten to name sections
instead, so a reader lands somewhere real.
The register row closes with it. hybrid.md freed a slot, ldls.md took it, and
it is now free again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
docs/plan/ldls.md L3a -- the class bridge, and the first of the three pieces
L3 turned out to be.
/dev/netdev is /dev/pci with the arrows reversed. That hands a device to a
process; this lets a process be one. The kernel side is netdev_ops and nothing
else -- transmit, receive, mac, link_up, the same four entries e1000
publishes -- so a process claims the device, supplies a MAC, and from then on
read() gives it frames the stack wants sent and write() hands it frames that
arrived.
cmd/netecho proves it and is deliberately not a driver: no hardware, none
claimed, every frame answered by the program itself. DHCP so the interface
gets an address at all, ARP so the stack can find it, ICMP so it can be
pinged. All built by hand from RFCs 826, 791, 792 and 2131.
# netecho &
netuser: ldls0 is a process now, 2:4c:44:4c:53:1
netecho: I am 10.9.0.1 and will offer 10.9.0.2
netecho: answered DHCP, offering an address
# cat /proc/netif
interface ldls0 driver netuser address 10.9.0.2 gateway 10.9.0.1
# ping 10.9.0.1 3
netecho: answered an ARP
netecho: answered a ping
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss
The interface got its address by DHCP from a process and then answered ping
from one. lwIP never learns that the thing behind netdev_ops is not a driver,
which is the whole property the bridge exists to have.
It dies the way it should, too. kill the process and link_up() answers false
immediately, so the stack refuses to send -- "ping: sendto: -5" -- rather than
swallowing packets into a driver that is not there. Start another and the
*same* interface comes back, keeping its address. That came free:
netuser_release_all() sits beside pciuser_release_all() in exit() for exactly
the same reason, and the reason is that a process holding a device is one that
may crash.
One thing the kernel needed: netinit() starts DHCP on the devices that exist
when it runs, so an interface created later -- which is how an LDLS-hosted
driver arrives -- would have come up with no address and no way to get one.
net_attach_late() fixes that, and lives in kernel/net/net.c because that is
the only file allowed to include lwIP's headers.
Recorded as not done, because it is not: this proves the bridge, not a driver.
Nothing in that test loads a module. That is why it was done first -- if ping
had not worked here the bridge would be wrong, and now a failure with a real
driver can only be the driver's side. L3b is the SchOS-side host, L3c is the
fifteen symbols for real, and L3 is the two joined.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
