| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
24f79194ab
docs/plan/hybrid.md mechanisms 2 and 4: MMIO and DMA to a process.
A process can enumerate the bus, claim a device exclusively, map its BARs and
get memory the device can be pointed at. Proven end to end against an e1000e
-- the exact device class we cannot drive and would want a foreign driver for:
device 7: 8086:10d3 (network)
claimed
BAR0 at 0x81060000, 128 KB
regs[0..3] = 0x00140261 0x00000000 0x00080283 0x00000000
MMIO reaches the device
DMA 8 KB at virtual 0x40001000, physical 0x3f8eb000
Those are the e1000e's CTRL and STATUS with full-duplex and link-up set, which
is how you tell a real mapping from one reading 0xFFFFFFFF off an unmapped
address. Claiming a device the kernel drives is refused -- two writers of one
register set looks like hardware that has started lying -- and everything a
process held is released when it exits, because a driver that crashed must not
keep its hardware away from its replacement.
mmap's offset is the BAR's physical address, checked against the BARs of
devices *this process has claimed*. Without that check the device is /dev/mem
with extra steps and a process could map the kernel's own memory. Mappings are
write-through: a cached write to a doorbell arrives whenever the cache feels
like it, which from a driver's side is indistinguishable from hardware that
ignores you.
The interface is about PCI devices, not about any driver model, and its first
users will be SchOS's own drivers when virtio-gpu is evicted. That ordering is
the design rather than an accident: an interface whose first consumers are
native drivers is a general mechanism something foreign can use later, instead
of a hole shaped like something foreign.
Also: PROT_* and MAP_* moved to include/posix.h. They were defined only in
sys_mem.c, so cmd/fbinfo carried a private copy and this wanted a third --
two copies of a number the kernel compares against, where a mismatch shows up
as a mapping with the wrong permissions rather than an error.
No IOMMU, so this isolates a driver against its own bugs and not against its
own DMA. The plan says so at length and it is still true.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
|
||
| .. | ||
| architecture | ||
| branding | ||
| guides | ||
| history | ||
| plan | ||
| Website | ||
| licensing.md | ||
| README.md | ||
SchOS documentation
Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.
| architecture/ | What SchOS is | Present tense. Describes what is built and working. |
| plan/ | What SchOS will be | Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt. |
| guides/ | How to work on it | Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it. |
| history/ | Why it is the way it is | Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix. |
Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.
The rule that keeps this from rotting
When something is finished, it moves from
plan/toarchitecture/and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.
A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.
So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:
- The code works and is tested.
- The plan entry is deleted.
- A description exists in
architecture/written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.
This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.
The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in
architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's
strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one
about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.
Start here
New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.
Trying to build it → guides/building.md.
Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line, then plan/README.md for the order.
Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.
architecture/ — what SchOS is
| README | The system, layer by layer. Read first. |
| boot.md | Firmware to the first userspace process. |
| kernel.md | SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP. |
| syscalls.md | The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run. |
| filesystem.md | The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts. |
| schfs.md | SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem. |
| devices.md | The device model, driver binding, the class vtables. |
| usb.md | xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers. |
| graphics.md | Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen. |
| networking.md | Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET. |
| init.md | schinit, PID 1, and the job manifests. |
plan/ — what SchOS will be
| README | The three current decisions and the order they happen in. |
| 1.0.md | The finish line. What 1.0 contains, and what is explicitly deferred past it. |
| foundations.md | The kernel work everything else is blocked on. |
| init.md | PID 1 becomes a role rather than a process. |
| wayland.md | The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room. |
| hybrid.md | Moving drivers out of the kernel. |
| schapi.md | The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise. |
| roadmap.md | Everything else still open. |
guides/ — how to work on it
| building.md | Prerequisites and the build, per host. |
| testing.md | The harnesses, and what each one actually proves. |
| layout.md | Repository map, and how to add a program or a port. |
| adding-a-driver.md | Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable. |
branding/ — the marks
| README | Shift the logo, Guru the icon, SchCotie the mascot: what each is for, the colour rule, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG. |
history/ — why it is the way it is
| README | What belongs in here and what does not. |
| kernel.md | Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom. |
| moving-to-linux.md | The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur. |
Writing one of these
Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:
State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.
Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.
Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.
No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a
changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in
history/, where they mean something.