| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
3f13989883
Gate 1, item 3, and the last of foundations.md.
bind() creates a T_SOCK node at the path; connect() resolves the path and looks
for the socket bound to **that inode**. Matching on the inode rather than on
the path *string* is the part that matters: the name used to live only in the
socket table, so two spellings of one path missed each other, a relative path
never matched an absolute one, and there was nothing to stat() or unlink().
An inode is the thing a path resolves *to*, so connect() can walk the path
however it likes and arrive at the same socket.
# ls -l /tmp
srwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 2026-09-22 08:04 socktest
The node is a marker, not the binding. It holds no data and the live
association stays in the socket table, so a socket file left by a crash is
what Linux leaves behind -- a dead file that connect() refuses until something
binds again -- and unlink()ing a live socket's path does not disturb anyone
already connected.
EADDRINUSE comes from the *directory* rather than from a scan of the table,
deliberately: a stale socket file has to refuse a rebind for the same reason a
running server's does, or two servers both believe they own it. The creation
lives in sys_bind() and not in unix.c, because that is the layer with both --
kernel/net/unix.c knows about sockets and has no business calling create().
T_SOCK is a compat addition to SchFS by the rule in schfs.h: a driver that does
not know SCHFS_T_SOCK maps it to a zero-length regular file, so nothing goes
stale and nothing becomes unreadable.
cmd/socktest section 15 asserts the plan's own wording -- bind, stat, see an
`s`, unlink -- plus the two a name table could never fail: a second bind to a
live path is refused, and connecting to a path that is a *regular file* is
refused rather than matched by name.
**And the semantics being real broke socktest on its second run**, correctly:
the socket files persisted and every bind() hit EADDRINUSE. Every real server
unlinks before binding; socktest now does too, which is the change the new
behaviour demands rather than a workaround for it.
Chasing that turned up something worse. `socktest` reported rc=1 with every
check passing, and so did every other first-party program:
- **lib/start.S called main and threw %eax away.** sys_exit() reads the
status from %rdi and nothing put it there, so every program exited with
whatever that register happened to hold. Every test suite ends in
`return failures ? 1 : 0` and none of it reached the shell.
- **exit(void) passed no status either**, for the same reason: the
declaration takes no argument, so %rdi was the caller's litter.
`if socktest; then` works now, and a failing command reports 1 -- checked both
ways, because a fix that makes everything return 0 would look identical from
the success side.
Also factored: unlink_path() out of sys_unlink, so a failed bind can take its
own node back out without going through the syscall entry, and create_sock()
as a named door rather than exporting create() with an arbitrary type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
| .. | ||
| architecture | ||
| branding | ||
| guides | ||
| history | ||
| plan | ||
| Website | ||
| licensing.md | ||
| README.md | ||
SchOS documentation
Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.
| architecture/ | What SchOS is | Present tense. Describes what is built and working. |
| plan/ | What SchOS will be | Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt. |
| guides/ | How to work on it | Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it. |
| history/ | Why it is the way it is | Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix. |
Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.
The rule that keeps this from rotting
When something is finished, it moves from
plan/toarchitecture/and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.
A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.
So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:
- The code works and is tested.
- The plan entry is deleted.
- A description exists in
architecture/written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.
This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.
The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in
architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's
strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one
about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.
Start here
New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.
Trying to build it → guides/building.md.
Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line and the register of everything half-built. Then plan/README.md for the order.
About to start something new → the register, first. Nothing new starts while it has rows in it, and a row leaves only by being finished or deleted.
Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.
architecture/ — what SchOS is
| README | The system, layer by layer. Read first. |
| boot.md | Firmware to the first userspace process. |
| kernel.md | SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP. |
| syscalls.md | The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run. |
| filesystem.md | The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts. |
| schfs.md | SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem. |
| devices.md | The device model, driver binding, the class vtables. |
| usb.md | xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers. |
| graphics.md | Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen. |
| terminals.md | The six virtual terminals, and how one is switched to. |
| networking.md | Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET. |
| init.md | schinit, PID 1 as a role, and the job manifests. |
plan/ — what SchOS will be
| README | The three current decisions and the order they happen in. |
| 1.0.md | The finish line, and the freeze. What 1.0 contains, what is deferred, and the register of every half-built thing in the tree. |
| foundations.md | The kernel work everything else is blocked on. |
| wayland.md | The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room. |
| hybrid.md | Moving drivers out of the kernel. |
| schapi.md | The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise. |
| roadmap.md | Everything else still open. |
guides/ — how to work on it
| building.md | Prerequisites and the build, per host. |
| testing.md | The harnesses, and what each one actually proves. |
| layout.md | Repository map, and how to add a program or a port. |
| adding-a-driver.md | Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable. |
branding/ — the marks
| README | Shift, the one mark: what it is for, the colour rule, why an icon and a mascot were removed, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG. |
history/ — why it is the way it is
| README | What belongs in here and what does not. |
| kernel.md | Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom. |
| schfs.md | The filesystem's own, from the same period as its design. |
| moving-to-linux.md | The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur. |
Writing one of these
Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:
State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.
Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.
Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.
No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a
changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in
history/, where they mean something.