SchOS/docs
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Nexoniarz 5263150d3d ldls: the plan for running someone else's drivers
docs/plan/ldls.md. SchOS cannot write a driver for every device that exists
and no project can, so the only route to the hardware support an established
system has is to run Linux's. hybrid.md built the mechanisms for this and said
so; vgpud proved them. This is what they were for.

Five rules, and everything else is an implementation of them:

  1. Nothing GPL ever enters an image we build. The driver is the user's,
     obtained by them, loaded on their machine.
  2. It runs in a process, never in the kernel. Legally a module linked into
     our kernel is the strongest derivative-work argument that exists, and
     practically this is foreign code that must not be able to take the
     machine. FreeBSD has shipped from this position for a decade.
  3. Facts, not expression. A symbol's signature and a struct's offsets are
     facts a compiled driver depends on; comments, macro bodies and inline
     bodies are expression and are never carried over. Provenance recorded per
     file. Flagged in the doc as wanting real legal advice before shipping.
  4. One kernel version at a time, pinned and named, because Linux says in
     writing that it has no stable in-kernel ABI.
  5. The unresolved-symbol list is the specification. Load a real module and
     let the loader say what is missing rather than guessing the surface.

Four pieces: an ELF relocatable loader (ours, clean, no licence question), the
KPI shim (the actual work), /dev/pci as the back end (built), and one new
kernel interface -- a netdev whose backend is a process, which is the exact
analogue of display_ops and is four vtable entries wide.

First target is 8139too rather than r8169, and the reason is decisive: QEMU
emulates rtl8139 and does not emulate r8169, so the obvious choice cannot be
tested at all. 8139too is also smaller, needs no firmware, and uses the thin
mii helpers instead of dragging in phylib. r8169 is what proves it was general,
afterwards and much more cheaply.

The "what it will not do" section carries the honest list, including the two
that are not yet answered: no EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL story, and no IOMMU -- which
for foreign drivers is a materially worse problem than for our own, and is the
strongest argument for one this project has produced.

hybrid.md is closed and leaves the register; ldls.md takes the slot, which is
the freeze rule working rather than being bent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
2026-09-14 01:51:30 +02:00
..
architecture hybrid: a modeset, from a process 2026-09-14 01:36:05 +02:00
branding ldls: the plan for running someone else's drivers 2026-09-14 01:51:30 +02:00
guides docs: the tree moved and the documentation did not 2026-09-13 20:05:06 +02:00
history kernel: processes have an environment now, and zsh is the shell 2026-09-12 23:26:50 +02:00
plan ldls: the plan for running someone else's drivers 2026-09-14 01:51:30 +02:00
Website hybrid: H4 withdrawn -- USB is not a peripheral 2026-09-14 01:45:58 +02:00
licensing.md ldls: the plan for running someone else's drivers 2026-09-14 01:51:30 +02:00
README.md freeze: one register for everything half-built, and the corners cleared 2026-09-13 20:28:05 +02:00

SchOS documentation

Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.

architecture/ What SchOS is Present tense. Describes what is built and working.
plan/ What SchOS will be Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt.
guides/ How to work on it Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it.
history/ Why it is the way it is Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix.

Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.


The rule that keeps this from rotting

When something is finished, it moves from plan/ to architecture/ and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.

A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.

So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:

  1. The code works and is tested.
  2. The plan entry is deleted.
  3. A description exists in architecture/ written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.

This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.

The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.


Start here

New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.

Trying to build it → guides/building.md.

Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line and the register of everything half-built. Then plan/README.md for the order.

About to start something new → the register, first. Nothing new starts while it has rows in it, and a row leaves only by being finished or deleted.

Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.


architecture/ — what SchOS is

README The system, layer by layer. Read first.
boot.md Firmware to the first userspace process.
kernel.md SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP.
syscalls.md The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run.
filesystem.md The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts.
schfs.md SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem.
devices.md The device model, driver binding, the class vtables.
usb.md xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers.
graphics.md Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen.
terminals.md The six virtual terminals, and how one is switched to.
networking.md Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET.
init.md schinit, PID 1 as a role, and the job manifests.

plan/ — what SchOS will be

README The three current decisions and the order they happen in.
1.0.md The finish line, and the freeze. What 1.0 contains, what is deferred, and the register of every half-built thing in the tree.
foundations.md The kernel work everything else is blocked on.
wayland.md The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room.
hybrid.md Moving drivers out of the kernel.
schapi.md The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise.
roadmap.md Everything else still open.

guides/ — how to work on it

building.md Prerequisites and the build, per host.
testing.md The harnesses, and what each one actually proves.
layout.md Repository map, and how to add a program or a port.
adding-a-driver.md Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable.

branding/ — the marks

README Shift the logo, Guru the icon, SchCotie the mascot: what each is for, the colour rule, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG.

history/ — why it is the way it is

README What belongs in here and what does not.
kernel.md Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom.
schfs.md The filesystem's own, from the same period as its design.
moving-to-linux.md The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur.

Writing one of these

Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:

State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.

Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.

Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.

No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in history/, where they mean something.