| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
7e88cea151
`#define ROOTDEV 1` -- IDE disk 1 -- so a kernel could only ever root on the
disk it was *built* expecting. Booting the same image from a USB stick was
impossible by construction, and that was the one thing standing between this
kernel and its own acceptance test, which begins "boot on real hardware from a
USB stick".
rootdev_mount() probes. schfs_kmount() was already written for exactly this --
its own comment says "the uberblock scan doubles as the probe: no valid
uberblock means this is simply not a SchFS volume, which is not an error worth
reporting loudly" -- and a failed probe leaves the slot unmounted and reusable,
which is what makes a loop over candidates legal at all. So the change is one
function and one call site; the only real use of ROOTDEV was `schfs_kmount()`.
Order is preference, not confidence: a RAMDISK_ROOT build wins outright, then
USB, then IDE 1, then IDE 0. USB before the fixed disks because a stick that is
plugged in was plugged in on purpose. iderw() panics on an absent drive rather
than failing, so each candidate is checked with ide_disk_present() /
usb_storage_present() first -- which is what those predicates are for.
Verified with **no IDE disk attached at all**: boots, mounts the stick, writes
a file, and the file is still there on the next boot.
[ 0.000021] root: USB disk (device 3)
And when nothing matches, it names what it looked at, because "no root
filesystem" with no list is the least useful thing a kernel can say at the one
moment somebody needs to know which disk it expected:
root: no SchFS volume on any candidate device. Looked at:
device 3, USB disk: not present
device 1, IDE disk 1: not present
device 0, IDE disk 0: present, but no SchFS on it
**That message is also how dmesg turned out to be broken**, because it did not
appear in `dmesg` and should have. `dmesg` printed *nothing at all*, on a
system whose boot banner says "or dmesg once you are in" and whose entire
quiet-boot design is "route the detail into the kernel log and say how to read
it". The log was there the whole time -- `cat /proc/kmsg` has always worked --
but the one command anybody would reach for could not see it.
Two separate faults, each alone enough:
- **sys_syslog() was `return 0`.** dmesg does not read /proc/kmsg; it calls
klogctl(10) for the buffer size and klogctl(3) to read. 0 to the first one
means "the log is zero bytes", and a stub that answers 0 is
indistinguishable from a machine that logged nothing. Implemented for the
actions that mean something here; the rest return -EINVAL rather than 0,
because a console log level this kernel does not have is not a request that
succeeded.
- **With that fixed, dmesg was still empty.** It parses every line with
`sscanf(msg, "<%u>[%llu.%llu] %n", ...)` and silently drops anything that
does not match. The ring's `[ 0.00] text` already matches everything
after the priority -- scanf skips the leading spaces -- so the only missing
thing was the `<6>`. klog_render_syslog() adds it on the way out rather
than storing it: the ring is also what a person reads with `cat
/proc/kmsg` and what PSOGM points at after a crash, and an ABI detail
belongs at the boundary that has the ABI.
Also: the first version of the no-root diagnostic printed
%-11s device 1596400
because cprintf() has no field-width specifier -- it prints "%-11s" literally
and then reads the next argument for the %d. Plain %s now, with the note.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
| .. | ||
| architecture | ||
| branding | ||
| guides | ||
| history | ||
| plan | ||
| Website | ||
| licensing.md | ||
| README.md | ||
SchOS documentation
Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.
| architecture/ | What SchOS is | Present tense. Describes what is built and working. |
| plan/ | What SchOS will be | Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt. |
| guides/ | How to work on it | Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it. |
| history/ | Why it is the way it is | Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix. |
Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.
The rule that keeps this from rotting
When something is finished, it moves from
plan/toarchitecture/and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.
A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.
So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:
- The code works and is tested.
- The plan entry is deleted.
- A description exists in
architecture/written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.
This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.
The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in
architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's
strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one
about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.
Start here
New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.
Trying to build it → guides/building.md.
Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line and the register of everything half-built. Then plan/README.md for the order.
About to start something new → the register, first. Nothing new starts while it has rows in it, and a row leaves only by being finished or deleted.
Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.
architecture/ — what SchOS is
| README | The system, layer by layer. Read first. |
| boot.md | Firmware to the first userspace process. |
| kernel.md | SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP. |
| syscalls.md | The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run. |
| filesystem.md | The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts. |
| schfs.md | SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem. |
| devices.md | The device model, driver binding, the class vtables. |
| usb.md | xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers. |
| graphics.md | Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen. |
| terminals.md | The six virtual terminals, and how one is switched to. |
| networking.md | Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET. |
| init.md | schinit, PID 1 as a role, and the job manifests. |
plan/ — what SchOS will be
| README | The three current decisions and the order they happen in. |
| 1.0.md | The finish line, and the freeze. What 1.0 contains, what is deferred, and the register of every half-built thing in the tree. |
| foundations.md | The kernel work everything else is blocked on. |
| wayland.md | The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room. |
| hybrid.md | Moving drivers out of the kernel. |
| schapi.md | The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise. |
| roadmap.md | Everything else still open. |
guides/ — how to work on it
| building.md | Prerequisites and the build, per host. |
| testing.md | The harnesses, and what each one actually proves. |
| layout.md | Repository map, and how to add a program or a port. |
| adding-a-driver.md | Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable. |
branding/ — the marks
| README | Shift, the one mark: what it is for, the colour rule, why an icon and a mascot were removed, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG. |
history/ — why it is the way it is
| README | What belongs in here and what does not. |
| kernel.md | Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom. |
| schfs.md | The filesystem's own, from the same period as its design. |
| moving-to-linux.md | The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur. |
Writing one of these
Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:
State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.
Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.
Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.
No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a
changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in
history/, where they mean something.