| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
a5ff83de46
Four Gate 0 rows, and a fifth found while checking one of them.
**getrusage() did not distinguish RUSAGE_CHILDREN from RUSAGE_SELF**, which
undersells it: it ignored `who` entirely and reported the machine's *uptime*
as the caller's user time. Every process of every age answered with the same
number. Per-process CPU time is sampled at the timer tick now and split on the
interrupted privilege level; children's time is rolled up in wait() rather than
exit(), because RUSAGE_CHILDREN means *reaped* children and a running one has
not contributed yet.
**And wait4()'s fourth argument is a `struct rusage *` that was read off the
stack and thrown away.** That is the one shells actually use -- wait3() is the
same syscall with pid -1 -- so zsh's `time` reported
16777216.01s user 1073.78s system 927983249% cpu
for every command. 2^24 seconds is uninitialised memory, and it did not vary
with the workload because it was never written. Now:
busy loop 2.66s user 97% cpu 2.720 total
sleep 2 0.02s user 0% cpu 2.248 total
ls -lR / 0.70s user 65% cpu 1.070 total
**ru_stime is a structural zero and says so.** MSR_SFMASK includes FL_IF, so
SYSCALL clears interrupts and no tick can land while a process is inside a
syscall. Tick sampling cannot see kernel time at all here. Charging it needs
TSC deltas closed and reopened around every sched(), which is scheduler
accounting rather than sampling; the limitation is written down in
docs/architecture/kernel.md rather than papered over.
**/proc/<pid>/exe is a symlink.** It also needed a real st_size, and every
other procfs file deliberately reports zero -- readlink(2) bounds its copy by
it, so a symlink of size 0 resolves to the empty string, which looks like it
worked and is worse than the regular file was. Generating that one path in
ilock() costs one small render per stat() of one file.
**OVMF memory reporting is closed**: 1 GB reports 1017 MB usable, 2 GB reports
2041 MB. The firmware keeps about 7 MB either way, which is the right shape.
**And `ps` printed a header and nothing else**, which is not in any list
because nobody had run it. `ps` with no arguments shows only processes on
*this* terminal; /proc/<pid>/stat hardcoded tty_nr to 0, so nothing could ever
match. `ps -e` always worked, which is exactly what hid it. p->ctty was already
tracked -- procfs simply was not asked. Fields 14..17 were hardcoded zero too,
so TIME read 00:00:00 however long a process had run; they carry the new
counters now, and a shell that has burned 653 ticks reports 00:00:06.
Verified: utime climbs 18 -> 653 across a loop in the shell itself, `ps` lists
its own terminal, `ps -e` still lists everything, `readlink /proc/1/exe` gives
/bin/schinit, and sigtest/$()/rename/dmesg are all still green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
| .. | ||
| architecture | ||
| branding | ||
| guides | ||
| history | ||
| plan | ||
| Website | ||
| licensing.md | ||
| README.md | ||
SchOS documentation
Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.
| architecture/ | What SchOS is | Present tense. Describes what is built and working. |
| plan/ | What SchOS will be | Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt. |
| guides/ | How to work on it | Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it. |
| history/ | Why it is the way it is | Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix. |
Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.
The rule that keeps this from rotting
When something is finished, it moves from
plan/toarchitecture/and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.
A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.
So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:
- The code works and is tested.
- The plan entry is deleted.
- A description exists in
architecture/written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.
This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.
The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in
architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's
strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one
about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.
Start here
New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.
Trying to build it → guides/building.md.
Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line and the register of everything half-built. Then plan/README.md for the order.
About to start something new → the register, first. Nothing new starts while it has rows in it, and a row leaves only by being finished or deleted.
Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.
architecture/ — what SchOS is
| README | The system, layer by layer. Read first. |
| boot.md | Firmware to the first userspace process. |
| kernel.md | SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP. |
| syscalls.md | The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run. |
| filesystem.md | The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts. |
| schfs.md | SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem. |
| devices.md | The device model, driver binding, the class vtables. |
| usb.md | xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers. |
| graphics.md | Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen. |
| terminals.md | The six virtual terminals, and how one is switched to. |
| networking.md | Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET. |
| init.md | schinit, PID 1 as a role, and the job manifests. |
plan/ — what SchOS will be
| README | The three current decisions and the order they happen in. |
| 1.0.md | The finish line, and the freeze. What 1.0 contains, what is deferred, and the register of every half-built thing in the tree. |
| foundations.md | The kernel work everything else is blocked on. |
| wayland.md | The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room. |
| hybrid.md | Moving drivers out of the kernel. |
| schapi.md | The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise. |
| roadmap.md | Everything else still open. |
guides/ — how to work on it
| building.md | Prerequisites and the build, per host. |
| testing.md | The harnesses, and what each one actually proves. |
| layout.md | Repository map, and how to add a program or a port. |
| adding-a-driver.md | Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable. |
branding/ — the marks
| README | Shift, the one mark: what it is for, the colour rule, why an icon and a mascot were removed, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG. |
history/ — why it is the way it is
| README | What belongs in here and what does not. |
| kernel.md | Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom. |
| schfs.md | The filesystem's own, from the same period as its design. |
| moving-to-linux.md | The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur. |
Writing one of these
Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:
State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.
Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.
Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.
No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a
changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in
history/, where they mean something.