SchOS/docs
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Nexoniarz 42f98130c4 ldls: a Linux driver, driving real hardware
docs/plan/ldls.md milestone L3c. ldls/kpi/ implements 41 of 8139too's 94
symbols rather than logging them: register access to a mapped BAR, the PCI
calls to /dev/pci, allocation to mmap and PCIIOC_DMA, register_netdev to
/dev/netdev.

    # ldlsd /lib/modules/8139too.ko /lib/modules/btf
      found   10ec:8139 at 00:05.0
      bar 1    0x0000000081060000  256 mem
      calling probe, with 41 of 94 symbols implemented
      kpi: mapped BAR 1 -- phys 0x0000000081060000, 256 bytes
      kpi: the driver read a MAC off the hardware: 52:54:00🆎cd:ef
      netuser: ldls0 is a process now, 52:54:0🆎cd:ef
      probe returned 0 after 0 stub call(s)

52:54:00🆎cd:ef is what the machine was configured with. Nothing invented
it: the driver bit-banged the card's EEPROM, serially, through a BAR mapped by
/dev/pci, and handed back what it found. That it matches means the loader, the
relocations, the BTF offsets, the BAR mapping and the register accessors are
all correct at once, which is why it was the thing to aim at. Zero stub calls:
every symbol probe reaches is implemented.

Two bugs, one of them the kernel's.

Mine first: pci_iomap checked a failed mmap for -1 only, while SchOS returns
-errno. It returned -13 as a pointer, the driver took that as its register
base, and the first write landed at 0x4e -- thirteen below where it meant to
be.

Underneath it, the real one. sys_mmap rounds a length up to a page, the only
granularity an MMU has, and pciuser_mmio_ok() compared that against the BAR's
own size. rtl8139's registers are 256 bytes, the request became 4096, and the
answer was -EACCES for a device the process legitimately held. A BAR smaller
than a page could never be mapped at all, and nothing had noticed because the
only consumer until now was virtio-gpu, whose BARs are large. The check is now
against the pages the BAR lies in, and the widening is named where it happens:
a sub-page BAR hands over the whole page, forced by the hardware rather than
chosen.

That is exactly what hybrid.md said a foreign driver would be good for --
"what it asks for is what a foreign driver would ask for too" -- arriving as a
concrete bug rather than a prediction.

kpi_io_ok() now bounds every ioread/iowrite against the mapping pci_iomap
returned. A stray access would otherwise be a page fault with no context, and
with no IOMMU a hosted driver's wild writes have to be caught early or not at
all. It is also what turned the fault above into two lines naming the offsets.

Not done, and said so in the output rather than only in the doc: no frame has
moved. ndo_open is never called and there is no transmit or receive path, so
ldlsd releases the interface instead of leaving it up -- a link that reports
itself up with nothing draining its queue is a black hole, and the stack would
send DHCP into it for ever. Down is the true answer until packets move. That
is L3d, now listed separately.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
2026-09-14 09:59:14 +02:00
..
architecture ldls: a Linux driver, driving real hardware 2026-09-14 09:59:14 +02:00
branding ldls: the plan for running someone else's drivers 2026-09-14 01:51:30 +02:00
guides docs: the tree moved and the documentation did not 2026-09-13 20:05:06 +02:00
history kernel: processes have an environment now, and zsh is the shell 2026-09-12 23:26:50 +02:00
plan ldls: a Linux driver, driving real hardware 2026-09-14 09:59:14 +02:00
Website hybrid: H4 withdrawn -- USB is not a peripheral 2026-09-14 01:45:58 +02:00
licensing.md ldls: Apache-2.0, and where the boundary actually is 2026-09-14 07:52:01 +02:00
README.md freeze: one register for everything half-built, and the corners cleared 2026-09-13 20:28:05 +02:00

SchOS documentation

Four kinds of document, kept in four directories, because they answer four different questions and go stale at four different rates.

architecture/ What SchOS is Present tense. Describes what is built and working.
plan/ What SchOS will be Future tense. Everything here is unbuilt.
guides/ How to work on it Imperative. Build it, test it, add to it.
history/ Why it is the way it is Past tense. Bugs whose cause is not visible from the fix.

Plus two that belong to no category and apply to everything: licensing.md — read it before copying anyone else's code in — and branding/, which holds the marks and the rules for using them.


The rule that keeps this from rotting

When something is finished, it moves from plan/ to architecture/ and is rewritten as a description of the thing rather than a record of building it.

A completed item is not a ticked checkbox. A ticked checkbox says the work happened; it does not say what the work produced, and six months later the checkbox is the only thing left and it explains nothing.

So finishing a piece of work has three steps, and the third is not optional:

  1. The code works and is tested.
  2. The plan entry is deleted.
  3. A description exists in architecture/ written for somebody who was not there — what it does, what shape it has, what it costs, and what it still does not do.

This is not bookkeeping. The tree has already proved it necessary: the network stack was finished, verified end to end, and for a month afterwards the only description of it anywhere was a checkbox in a roadmap, four levels of indentation deep, written in the past tense of somebody arguing for the work rather than explaining the result.

The "what it does not do" section is the one that pays. Every description in architecture/ ends with one. A document that only lists a subsystem's strengths is marketing, and the reader who most needs the document is the one about to trip over a limitation nobody wrote down.


Start here

New to the tree → architecture/README.md, the system layer by layer, then guides/layout.md for where the files are.

Trying to build it → guides/building.md.

Wondering what happens next → plan/1.0.md, which is the finish line and the register of everything half-built. Then plan/README.md for the order.

About to start something new → the register, first. Nothing new starts while it has rows in it, and a row leaves only by being finished or deleted.

Something is broken and it feels familiar → history/. There is a good chance it is in there.


architecture/ — what SchOS is

README The system, layer by layer. Read first.
boot.md Firmware to the first userspace process.
kernel.md SchIFT: memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP.
syscalls.md The call table, and the Linux personality that lets real software run.
filesystem.md The VFS, the buffer cache, procfs, mounts.
schfs.md SchFS: the copy-on-write root filesystem.
devices.md The device model, driver binding, the class vtables.
usb.md xHCI, the USB core, and the class drivers.
graphics.md Framebuffer, text rendering, console, and the crash screen.
terminals.md The six virtual terminals, and how one is switched to.
networking.md Drivers, lwIP, sockets — Unix and INET.
init.md schinit, PID 1 as a role, and the job manifests.

plan/ — what SchOS will be

README The three current decisions and the order they happen in.
1.0.md The finish line, and the freeze. What 1.0 contains, what is deferred, and the register of every half-built thing in the tree.
foundations.md The kernel work everything else is blocked on.
wayland.md The GUI stack, and what gets deleted to make room.
hybrid.md Moving drivers out of the kernel.
schapi.md The long-term API layering, and the compatibility promise.
roadmap.md Everything else still open.

guides/ — how to work on it

building.md Prerequisites and the build, per host.
testing.md The harnesses, and what each one actually proves.
layout.md Repository map, and how to add a program or a port.
adding-a-driver.md Writing one, binding it, publishing its class vtable.

branding/ — the marks

README Shift the logo, Guru the icon, SchCotie the mascot: what each is for, the colour rule, and why a raster is committed next to its SVG.

history/ — why it is the way it is

README What belongs in here and what does not.
kernel.md Bugs whose cause was nowhere near their symptom.
schfs.md The filesystem's own, from the same period as its design.
moving-to-linux.md The Windows-to-Fedora move, kept for the parts that recur.

Writing one of these

Four conventions, all of them observable in the existing files:

State the cost. Every design choice gave something up. A document that does not say what is a document that will be argued with later by somebody who only sees the downside.

Prefer the measured number to the remembered one. "500 of 3565 files carry the advertising clause" is worth more than "some do", and it was worth the minute it took to count.

Write down the bug that shaped it. Half the non-obvious code in this tree is non-obvious because something failed once. If a design is strange, the strangeness is load-bearing and the reader deserves to know why before changing it.

No dates in headings. A date in a heading turns a description into a changelog, and the description is the thing with a long life. Dates belong in history/, where they mean something.