| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
The sweet spot was available the whole time and I ruled it out by writing
"AltGr+anything" when the true statement is "AltGr+*letter*".
A Polish layout wants AltGr with a letter -- ą ć ę ł ń ó ś ź ż. AltGr with a
function key produces nothing on any layout, no window manager binds it, and
no application asks for it. It is the one combination the host, applications
and the keyboard layout all leave alone, and the previous three commits talked
themselves out of it on a technicality that was mine, not the hardware's.
Verified rather than argued, with QEMU sendkey and screendump hashes:
AltGr+F2 -> tty2
AltGr+F1 -> back, pixel-identical to the start
AltGr+a -> reaches zsh, so ą still types
That distinction is only expressible because Right Alt became its own modifier
bit two commits ago. Sharing ALT is harmless for typing -- neither is used to
look up a character -- and made this impossible to say.
Also added, since it was asked for in the same breath: minus and equals step
to the previous and next terminal, on whatever the chord's modifiers are. They
skip terminals that are not in use -- the same `opened` count VT_GETSTATE
reports -- because six terminals with two shells on them means four blank
screens in between, and cycling past those is worse than not having the key.
AltGr+= -> tty2, again -> wraps to tty1 (only two in use)
AltGr+- -> tty2
chvt -c still moves all of it, and `chvt` reports both halves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
|
||
| .. | ||
| boot.md | ||
| devices.md | ||
| filesystem.md | ||
| graphics.md | ||
| init.md | ||
| kernel.md | ||
| networking.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| schfs.md | ||
| syscalls.md | ||
| terminals.md | ||
| usb.md | ||
The system, layer by layer
What SchOS is today. Everything in this directory is built and running; what is merely intended lives in ../plan/.
The names, and what each one covers
uname -s reports SchIFT, the way every Unix reports its kernel rather than
its distribution.
| Layer | Name | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| System | SchOS | The distribution — kernel, userland, tooling |
| Kernel | SchIFT | Multi-core x86-64 kernel with a modular VFS |
| Filesystem | SchFS | Transactional, copy-on-write, the root filesystem |
| API | SchAPI | The native programming interface — designed, not built |
| Compositor | Schcom | Owns the display; v0 runs |
Six virtual terminals sit under all of it -- /dev/tty1..tty6, AltGr+F1..F6
or chvt N --
each with its own screen, line discipline and foreground process group. See
terminals.md.
The stack, bottom to top
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ toybox mksh musl first-party cmd/ │ userland
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ schinit — PID 1, job manifests, supervision │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ syscall table — Linux numbering, one .inc file │ ← the ABI seam
╞═════════════════════════════════════════════════╡
│ VFS │ sockets │ signals │ mmap │ poll │ procfs │
├──────┴─────────┴─────────┴──────┴──────┴────────┤
│ SchFS │ lwIP │ text/gfx │ buffer cache │
├─────────┴────────┴────────────┴─────────────────┤
│ device model — class vtables, bus binding │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ drivers: xHCI e1000 virtio-gpu VBE IDE PS/2│
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ scheduler │ paging │ traps │ IRQ │ SMP │ DMA │ SchIFT core
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲
UEFI loader (boot/uefi)
The two seams that matter are the syscall table and the device model. Above the first, software is ordinary and portable — musl and toybox are unmodified. Below the second, a driver never names its consumer and a consumer never names a driver.
Where it came from
SchOS began as xv6 and is now mostly something else. What survives from xv6 is the shape of the process table, the sleep/wakeup discipline, and the buffer cache. What has been replaced: the scheduler and trap path (rewritten for x86-64 and for more than one processor), the memory manager, the entire filesystem, the syscall layer, and every driver.
That inheritance is worth knowing when reading the code, because the parts that still look like xv6 follow xv6's conventions and the parts that do not, do not.
The documents
Read in this order if you are new:
| boot.md | Firmware to the first userspace process. The shortest path through the whole system. |
| kernel.md | Memory, processes, scheduling, traps, signals, SMP. |
| syscalls.md | The one table everything is generated from, and how a musl binary runs unmodified. |
| filesystem.md | The VFS, the buffer cache, mounts, procfs. |
| schfs.md | The copy-on-write root filesystem. |
| devices.md | Buses, classes, binding, and the vtables consumers talk to. |
| usb.md | xHCI, the USB core, and the three class drivers. |
| graphics.md | Framebuffer, text rendering, the console, and PSOGM. |
| networking.md | NIC drivers, lwIP, and both socket families. |
| init.md | schinit and the job manifests. |
Three rules that hold across all of it
The kernel and the host tools compile the same SchFS source. mkschfs
cannot disagree with the kernel about the on-disk format, because there is only
one implementation. Format bugs are found on the host, where a test takes a
second instead of a boot.
Syscalls are declared in exactly one place. kernel/sys/table.inc.
The constants, the dispatch table and the Linux translation map are all
generated from it, so a syscall cannot be half-registered.
A list you can read beats a list assembled by side effects. Drivers are
written out by hand in kernel/drivers/registry.c rather than collected by a
linker section, and platform devices are registered in one function rather than
inside each driver's init. The tradeoff is deliberate: self-registration is
nicer to write, and it means the list of what is in your kernel is not written
down anywhere you can read.