Three symptoms, two causes, both in the terminal layer.
**The grid and TIOCGWINSZ disagreed about the size.** vt_init() sizes every
grid from gfx_cols()/gfx_rows(), and it runs at main.c:75 -- while the display
driver attaches its scanout from the PCI bus walk at main.c:99. So the grids
were the 80x24 fallback, and TIOCGWINSZ, which computed its own answer live,
said 160x50.
That one disagreement produced all three things visible in the report: text
stopped two thirds of the way down the screen, `ls` laid out 160 columns into
an 80-column grid so words split across the wrap ("vers" / "ion"), and zsh's
cursor tracking was wrong on every line.
Fixed in two places, because either alone would leave the trap set:
gfx_attach_scanout() now calls vt_resize(), so the grids learn the real screen
the moment there is one; and TIOCGWINSZ reports v->cols/v->rows rather than
measuring again. One number, from the terminal being asked.
**Wrapping was eager.** A glyph printed in the last column moved the cursor to
the next line immediately. Real terminals set a pending-wrap flag and wrap when
the *next* glyph arrives -- which is why a line exactly as wide as the screen
takes one row and not two, and why a program can write the bottom-right cell
without scrolling.
zsh's partial-line marker depends on that rule directly: it writes exactly
COLUMNS-1 spaces and expects to still be on the line. With eager wrap it left a
reverse-video '#' above every prompt, which is the hashtag in the report. Both
are gone.
Verified by screendump: `ls /proc` now fits one line with "version" intact, no
markers, and output fills the screen to the last row. schfs-check passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQ7Qx8E1q1M1bbCq8QLHS2
6.8 KiB
Virtual terminals
Six of them, /dev/tty1 through /dev/tty6, reached with Alt+F1..Alt+F6
or with chvt N. Each one is an independent terminal: its own screen, its own
cursor, its own line discipline, its own foreground process group and its own
session. Two shells on two terminals are two unrelated processes that happen to
share a keyboard and a screen.
Alt+F7 is deliberately unused. That is where a display server goes.
What makes switching possible
A backing store, and nothing else.
Before this, the console drew straight into the framebuffer and scrolled by moving pixels. That works exactly as long as nothing else ever wants the screen: there was nowhere to put terminal 2 while terminal 1 was visible, and nothing to repaint terminal 1 from when it came back.
So each terminal owns a grid of cells and the framebuffer shows whichever grid
is active. vt_switch() is three lines — set the active index, repaint from
the grid, return — because nothing has to be saved on the way out. The
outgoing terminal's grid has been current all along.
The rule the whole layer is built on:
A terminal does not know whether it is visible.
Writes land in the grid, the cursor moves, the grid scrolls, all of it
unconditionally. Drawing is a separate question, asked once, at the bottom of
kernel/dev/vt.c, answered by comparing against vt_active. Every alternative
spreads "am I on screen" through the escape parser, and then a terminal
switched away from mid-sequence comes back wrong.
A cell
Four bytes:
ch |
the glyph the font draws — not a codepoint |
fg, bg |
palette indices, 0-15 ANSI plus two theme defaults |
attr |
reverse video; room for underline and the rest |
ch stores the glyph rather than the codepoint because the console maps UTF-8
to CP437 before it gets here, and that is what include/font.h contains.
Storing the codepoint would mean re-running the mapping on every repaint and
getting a different answer for anything the font cannot draw.
The colours are indices rather than RGB because a cell holding two 32-bit colours would be twelve bytes instead of four, and the grids are static: six terminals at 240x75 is 432 KB of BSS, paid once at link time rather than failed to pay at run time. There is no contiguous multi-page allocator to ask.
What is per-terminal
Everything that used to be a single global:
| Was | Now |
|---|---|
int tty_fg_pgrp = 1; |
v->fg_pgrp, one per terminal |
one struct termios tio |
v->tio |
| one 256-byte input ring | v->in |
| one escape-parser state | v->esc_* |
| one UTF-8 decoder | v->u8_* |
one cursor, in pixels, in gfx.c |
v->cx, v->cy, in cells |
TIOCSCTTY used to be return 0 — it claimed to make a terminal the caller's
controlling terminal and did nothing, because there was one terminal and
nothing to choose between. It records proc->ctty now, which is what
/dev/tty resolves through.
The devices
| Path | Minor | What |
|---|---|---|
/dev/console |
1 | the active terminal, so kernel messages follow a switch |
/dev/tty |
10 | the caller's controlling terminal, via proc->ctty |
/dev/tty1..tty6 |
11-16 | that terminal, whether or not it is on screen |
/dev/tty was an alias for /dev/console with the same major and minor. They
are different questions and now have different answers.
The ioctls
Linux's numbers, because they do Linux's job.
VT_ACTIVATE |
switch. Argument is a 1-based number by value, not a pointer |
VT_WAITACTIVE |
returns immediately: vt_switch repaints synchronously, so there is nothing left to wait for |
VT_GETSTATE |
active terminal and a bitmask of those in use |
VT_OPENQRY |
the first terminal nobody has open |
VT_GETMODE/VT_SETMODE |
accepted and ignored — the kernel drives switching and there is no process mode to set |
The keyboard
kbd.c recognises Alt+F1..F6 and returns KEY_ALT_F1 + n, which is above
0xFF on purpose: every value that fits in a byte is already either a character
or a UTF-8 continuation byte, and a chord that collided with one would be typed
into the terminal instead of switching away from it.
What the chord means is decided in console.c, where the terminals are. The
keyboard driver names it and stops.
Input goes to whichever terminal is on screen. That is what makes a terminal a terminal: the keyboard follows the eyes.
Two rules that are easy to get wrong
The grid is the only source of truth for the size. TIOCGWINSZ reports
v->cols/v->rows, not a fresh gfx_cols()/gfx_rows(). When it computed
its own answer there were two, and they disagreed: the grids are sized at
vt_init(), which runs before the display driver is found on the PCI bus, so
they were 80x24 while TIOCGWINSZ said 160x50. Text stopped two thirds of the
way down the screen, ls formatted for a width the grid did not have and split
words across the wrap, and zsh's cursor tracking was wrong on every line --
three symptoms, one disagreement. vt_resize() now corrects the grids when a
scanout arrives, and the ioctl reads them.
A glyph in the last column does not wrap. It sets wrap_pending, and the
wrap happens when the next glyph arrives. Every real terminal behaves this
way and none of them document it clearly. Wrapping immediately makes a line
exactly as wide as the screen take two rows instead of one, and makes it
impossible to write the bottom-right cell without scrolling -- and zsh's
partial-line marker depends on the rule directly: it writes exactly
COLUMNS - 1 spaces and expects the cursor to still be on that line. With
immediate wrap, a reverse-video # appeared above every prompt.
Anything that moves the cursor deliberately -- CR, LF, backspace, an escape sequence -- clears the debt.
What it does not do
- No scrollback. The grid is exactly the visible screen. Shift+PageUp does nothing because there is nothing above the top row to show.
- No reflow on resize. The geometry is read once at
vt_init(). Nothing resizes a framebuffer console today; a compositor will, and that is when this has to grow. - No process-mode switching.
VT_SETMODEis accepted and ignored. A display server that wants to veto a switch — which is whatVT_PROCESSis for — cannot yet, and will need to before Schcom owns Alt+F7. - No terminal past 6. Linux allows 63. Six is what the chords reach and what the grids are sized for.
- Only 240x75 of any screen. Larger framebuffers work; the grid is clamped
and the remainder stays background. Raising
VT_MAXCOLS/VT_MAXROWSis the fix, and costs BSS. - No UTF-8 the font lacks. CP437 has ~256 glyphs. Anything else draws as
?, which is deliberate: drawing a different character would be worse.